Skip to content
FM Solutions

FileMaker to web modernization

Modernization Has Overtaken FileMaker.

The speed, flexibility, and simplicity that once made FileMaker exceptional are no longer exclusive to it. Keep your data and business logic, and move to independent web software.

  • Free 3-hour consultation
  • Complete or phased migration
  • Led by a 15+ year specialist
The tracking list of the original FM Solutions FileMaker system, with time entries grouped by member
The overview screen of Satnica, the web application that replaced the FileMaker system
FileMakerWeb application
Authentic screens from FM Solutions: our own FileMaker system and Satnica, the web application that replaced it. Drag to compare.
Nihad Suljic, CEO and Founder of FM Solutions, in a dark suit and navy tie
Nihad SuljicFounder & Solutions Architect

Who you will work with

Led by a FileMaker specialist with 15+ years of experience.

Nihad Suljic founded FM Solutions and leads every FileMaker migration review. We replaced our own FileMaker system with Satnica, so we know both sides of this decision first-hand.

15+
Years of experience
8,000+
Hours worked on Upwork
100%
Upwork Job Success
  • FileMaker development
  • Web application migration
  • Custom software

Opens in a new tab. Check the figures on the live profile.

Why businesses move

Why Teams Move Beyond FileMaker

FileMaker is still a capable platform, and well-built systems avoid many problems. These are the reasons we hear most often when a system outgrows it.

  • Web access without workarounds

    Customers, partners, and staff on any device can use one browser-based application.

  • Your own architecture

    You own the code and the database, and you are not tied to a single vendor’s platform and licensing.

  • Reporting and integrations

    Standard web tooling for charts, APIs, and automation, with documented trade-offs for each.

  • Faster change with AI assistance

    Developer-led, AI-assisted engineering shortens analysis and build work without removing review.

Read the full technical comparison

Two paths. One destination.

Two Ways to Move Beyond FileMaker. You Don't Have to Replace Everything Overnight.

Both strategies end with an independent modern web application and FileMaker retired. We do not promote permanent coexistence.

Path 1

Complete Migration

Replace the whole application in one planned program, then switch over.

  1. 1Audit
  2. 2Rebuild
  3. 3Data Migration
  4. 4Testing
  5. 5Launch
  6. FileMaker Retirement

Path 2

Phased Migration

Replace module by module while operations continue, ending with retirement.

  1. 1Audit
  2. 2Prioritize Modules
  3. 3Migrate Workflows
  4. 4Synchronize and Validate
  5. 5Transition Remaining Modules
  6. FileMaker Retirement

100% FileMaker Independence

During a phased migration FileMaker can remain temporarily, but it is not the intended permanent architecture.

Free consulting

Start With 3 Hours of Free Consulting

Describe your system in a short form. We review it and reply by email with an honest view of which path fits, before any commitment to a project.

  • Your current application architecture
  • Complete vs. phased replacement
  • Migration complexity and risks
  • Recommended next steps

AI-assisted discovery

Start With an Analysis of Your Real System

We use AI to read the structure of your solution so the first conversation is about your actual tables, scripts, and layouts. Developers review every output and make every decision.

See how AI-assisted discovery works
  • An inventory of tables, relationships, layouts, and scripts
  • Plain-language summaries of what scripts do
  • Risk flags for complex or unclear logic
  • Options for complete or phased migration

A completed replacement

We Replaced Our Own FileMaker System With Satnica

Real screens from the FileMaker system we built and the web application that replaced it. Drag the handle to compare.

The tracking list of the original FM Solutions FileMaker system, with time entries grouped by member
The overview screen of Satnica, the web application that replaced the FileMaker system
FileMakerSatnica
Completed replacement. Screenshots of Satnica use demonstration data.
  • Understanding the original business logic

    We built the FileMaker system ourselves, so we knew the rules behind every screen before replacing it.

  • Redesigning workflows for the web

    We rethought how each workflow should work in a browser instead of copying FileMaker layouts.

  • Preserving necessary operational processes

    The processes the business depends on were identified first and carried over deliberately.

See all case studies and client reviews

FAQ

Questions FileMaker teams ask us

Feasibility, cost, and timeline depend on your system, so every answer points back to an initial audit.

Can my FileMaker application be completely replaced?

In many cases, yes. A complete replacement rebuilds the workflows, data model, and reports as an independent web application and then retires FileMaker. How feasible and how large the project is depends on your system size, integrations, and business rules, which we assess in an audit before proposing a plan.

Can I migrate without interrupting daily operations?

That is the main purpose of the phased approach: modules move one at a time while the rest of the system keeps running, and data is synchronized and validated between them. A complete replacement is usually built in parallel and switched over on an agreed date after testing. The cutover plan depends on your operations and is agreed in advance.

Will I lose my existing data?

Data migration is planned and validated as part of the project. We analyze your data structures, load records into the new database, and reconcile the results against the source before go-live. Your FileMaker data stays in place until you decide to retire it. Legacy data often contains inconsistencies, so some cleanup decisions may be needed along the way.

Can complex FileMaker scripts be migrated?

Scripts are not converted automatically. We analyze what each script does for the business, then re-implement the logic as application code, database rules, or background jobs, or retire it if it no longer serves a purpose. Complex scripts need more analysis and testing, which is reflected in the plan.

What happens to related records and business logic?

We translate the relationship graph into an explicit relational schema with defined keys and constraints, and document the business rules found in calculations, validations, and scripts. Those rules are implemented on the server, with tests for the critical ones. Portals typically become data tables with filtering, sorting, and pagination.

FileMaker Helped Build Your Business. It Doesn't Have to Define Its Future.

Discover how modern web technologies and AI-assisted development can help you replace legacy FileMaker applications with software built for the next stage of your business.

Start Your FileMaker Exit Strategy

Free consulting

Your FileMaker Exit Strategy Starts Here.

Get 3 hours of free consulting to explore how your business can move beyond FileMaker.

We will discuss

  • Your current application architecture
  • Operational challenges
  • Migration complexity
  • Complete vs. phased replacement
  • Modernization opportunities
  • Recommended next steps
Describe it, do not upload it
A short description is enough to start. Please do not send databases, files, credentials, or sensitive data through this form.
Your details stay with the enquiry
We use them only to respond to you.

Fields marked optional can be left empty. All other fields are required.

Preferred direction

Prefer email? Write to info@fmsolutions.ba instead.

Your details are used only to respond to you. See our Privacy Policy.